Research Paper Outliner
The Research Paper Outliner generates a detailed, section-by-section blueprint for academic papers, complete with thesis refinement, argument structure, evidence placement, and transition logic. Instead of staring at a blank document, you start writing with a clear roadmap that tells you what each paragraph should accomplish.
Undergraduate and graduate students writing term papers, researchers drafting journal articles, and professionals writing white papers or policy briefs use this template. It works for argumentative essays, literature reviews, empirical research papers, and analytical case studies across all disciplines.
The prompt produces a meaningfully better outline than a generic "outline my paper" request because it forces you to articulate your thesis, available evidence, and counterarguments upfront. The AI then organizes these into a logical progression where each section builds on the previous one. Each outline point includes not just the topic, but the specific claim, the evidence that supports it, and how it connects to the overall argument, so the writing phase becomes execution rather than invention.
This prompt is just the starting point
Score it with AI, optimize it with one click, track versions, and build your prompt library.
The Prompt
Create a detailed outline for the following research paper: **Paper Title (working)**: [YOUR WORKING TITLE, e.g., "The Impact of Remote Work on Employee Productivity: A Meta-Analysis of Post-Pandemic Studies"] **Course / Publication Target**: [CONTEXT, e.g., "Graduate-level Organizational Behavior seminar, 15-20 pages" or "Targeting Journal of Management Studies"] **Thesis / Main Argument**: [YOUR THESIS IN 1-2 SENTENCES, e.g., "Remote work increases individual task productivity by 10-15% for knowledge workers, but decreases collaborative innovation output, suggesting hybrid models optimize for both outcomes"] **Key Sources Available** (list 5-10): ``` [LIST YOUR MAIN SOURCES WITH BRIEF NOTES ON WHAT EACH CONTRIBUTES, e.g., - Bloom et al. (2015) - original Ctrip experiment showing 13% productivity increase - Gibbs et al. (2023) - post-pandemic data showing increased hours but decreased output per hour - Yang et al. (2022) - Microsoft study on collaboration network effects of remote work] ``` **Counterarguments to Address**: [WHAT OPPOSES YOUR THESIS, e.g., "Some studies show remote work decreases productivity due to distractions at home and reduced accountability"] **Required Sections or Format**: [ANY REQUIREMENTS, e.g., "APA format, needs Literature Review, Methodology, Discussion" or "No specific format required"] Generate a detailed outline with these components: ### 1. Thesis Refinement Review my thesis statement and suggest a refined version that is more specific, arguable, and well-scoped for the paper length. Explain what changed and why. ### 2. Paper Structure Organize the paper into major sections. For each section, provide: **Section Title** - **Purpose**: What this section accomplishes in the paper's overall argument (1 sentence) - **Key claim**: The main point this section makes - **Paragraph-by-paragraph breakdown**: - Paragraph 1: [Topic sentence + supporting evidence + source] - Paragraph 2: [Topic sentence + supporting evidence + source] - (continue for each paragraph in the section) - **Transition**: How this section connects to the next one ### 3. Introduction Strategy Outline the introduction specifically: - Opening hook (2-3 options to choose from) - Background context needed before presenting the thesis - Thesis statement placement - Roadmap sentence previewing the paper structure ### 4. Counterargument Integration For each counterargument: - Where in the paper it should appear - How to present it fairly (steelmanning, not strawmanning) - The specific evidence or reasoning that refutes or qualifies it - How addressing it strengthens your thesis ### 5. Conclusion Blueprint - Restatement of thesis (evolved, not repeated verbatim) - Summary of the strongest evidence - Implications: what your findings mean for the field or for practice - Limitations to acknowledge - Future research directions (2-3 specific questions) ### 6. Source Integration Map Create a table showing which sources appear in which sections, ensuring: - No section relies on a single source - Key sources appear in multiple sections (showing different facets) - Sources that contradict each other are placed in productive dialogue
Usage Tips
- List your actual sources: The outline is dramatically better when it can place specific studies and arguments into specific sections. Even listing 5 sources with one-line descriptions transforms the output.
- State your counterarguments honestly: The strongest papers address their best opposing arguments head-on. Listing the counterarguments you find most challenging produces a more rigorous outline than hiding weaknesses.
- Use the paragraph-level detail for writing: Each paragraph entry in the outline is essentially a writing prompt. When you sit down to draft, you can write one paragraph at a time without deciding what comes next.
- Refine the thesis iteratively: If the refined thesis the AI suggests resonates, use it. If not, reply with "I prefer my original thesis because [reason], but incorporate your suggestion about [specific element]." Thesis development is a dialogue.
- Check the source integration map: If one source dominates three sections while another appears nowhere, you either need more sources or need to restructure. The map makes imbalances visible before you write.
Get more from this prompt
Save it, score it with AI, optimize it, and track every version. Free to start.